Quality Management Plan
- Document Title: Quality Management Plan
- Version: 1.0
- Date: 2023-10-17
- Status: Draft
- Document Owner: ICT Governance Team
Table of Contents
- Introduction
- Quality Management Approach
- Quality Roles and Responsibilities
- Quality Standards
- Quality Control
- Quality Assurance
- Quality Metrics
- Quality Improvement Process
- Quality Tools and Techniques
- Quality Documentation
- Appendices
Introduction
Purpose
This Quality Management Plan establishes the quality management approach, responsibilities, processes, and standards for the ICT Governance Framework Application. It serves as a guide for ensuring that all aspects of the framework meet or exceed stakeholder requirements and quality expectations.
Scope
This plan applies to all components of the ICT Governance Framework Application, including:
- Azure automation scripts and modules
- Infrastructure as Code (IaC) templates
- Documentation and guidance materials
- User interfaces and dashboards
- Integration components
- Deployment and operational processes
Definitions
- Quality: The degree to which the ICT Governance Framework fulfills stated and implied needs of stakeholders.
- Quality Management: The coordinated activities to direct and control the organization with regard to quality.
- Quality Assurance (QA): The planned and systematic activities implemented to provide confidence that quality requirements will be fulfilled.
- Quality Control (QC): The operational techniques and activities used to verify that quality requirements have been fulfilled.
- Defect: Any deviation from specified requirements or expectations.
- Quality Metrics: Quantifiable measurements used to track and assess quality performance.
Quality Management Approach
Quality Philosophy
The ICT Governance Framework Application employs a quality management approach based on the following principles:
- Quality is built into every aspect of the framework, not inspected after the fact
- Continuous improvement through feedback and measurement
- Prevention over detection and correction
- Data-driven decision making
- Adherence to industry standards and best practices
Quality Management Methodology
The quality management methodology incorporates elements from:
- ISO 9001:2015 Quality Management Systems
- CMMI (Capability Maturity Model Integration)
- Microsoft Azure Well-Architected Framework
- DevOps quality practices
- Agile quality management approaches
Quality Management Process
The quality management process consists of the following key activities:
- Plan: Define quality requirements, standards, and acceptance criteria
- Assure: Implement processes to ensure quality requirements will be met
- Control: Verify that work products meet quality standards
- Improve: Continuously analyze and enhance quality processes
Quality Roles and Responsibilities
Quality Management Team
The Quality Management Team provides oversight and guidance for all quality-related activities:
Role |
Responsibilities |
Quality Manager |
- Overall accountability for quality management - Approve quality deliverables - Facilitate quality reviews - Report on quality metrics and status |
Quality Assurance Specialist |
- Develop and maintain quality assurance processes - Perform quality audits - Identify quality improvement opportunities - Provide quality guidance to teams |
Quality Control Analyst |
- Execute quality control activities - Document and track defects - Verify corrective actions - Analyze quality trends |
Extended Team Responsibilities
Role |
Quality Responsibilities |
Project Manager |
- Ensure quality activities are scheduled and resourced - Balance quality requirements with scope, schedule, and budget - Escalate quality issues as needed |
Development Team |
- Adhere to coding standards and best practices - Perform peer reviews and unit testing - Resolve identified defects - Participate in quality improvement initiatives |
Infrastructure Team |
- Ensure infrastructure components meet quality standards - Implement infrastructure testing - Monitor performance and reliability metrics |
Documentation Team |
- Create high-quality documentation - Ensure documentation accuracy and completeness - Update documentation based on feedback |
Stakeholders |
- Provide clear quality requirements - Participate in acceptance testing - Provide feedback on quality issues |
Quality Standards
Code Quality Standards
- PowerShell Code Standards:
- Follow Microsoft PowerShell Scripting Best Practices
- Adhere to PSScriptAnalyzer rules
- Maintain code documentation with comment-based help
- Implement proper error handling and logging
- Infrastructure as Code Standards:
- Follow Azure Bicep/ARM template best practices
- Implement modular and reusable templates
- Include comprehensive parameter validation
- Document all template parameters and outputs
- General Coding Standards:
- Use consistent naming conventions
- Implement appropriate error handling
- Maintain code readability and maintainability
- Follow the DRY (Don’t Repeat Yourself) principle
Documentation Quality Standards
- Follow Microsoft Style Guide for technical documentation
- Ensure accuracy and completeness of all documentation
- Maintain consistency in terminology and formatting
- Include appropriate diagrams and visual aids
- Review documentation for clarity and usability
Testing Quality Standards
- Comprehensive test coverage for all components
- Well-documented test cases with clear pass/fail criteria
- Traceability between tests and requirements
- Appropriate mix of manual and automated testing
- Regular regression testing for all changes
- Response time for interactive operations: < 2 seconds
- Batch processing time for compliance checks: < 15 minutes for 10,000 resources
- Dashboard refresh time: < 5 seconds
- API response time: < 1 second for 95% of requests
- System availability: 99.9% excluding planned maintenance
Security Quality Standards
- Adherence to Microsoft Security Development Lifecycle (SDL)
- Implementation of least privilege principles
- Proper encryption for data in transit and at rest
- Regular security scanning and testing
- Comprehensive audit logging
Quality Control
Quality Control Activities
The following quality control activities will be performed throughout the project lifecycle:
Activity |
Description |
Frequency |
Responsible |
Code Reviews |
Systematic examination of code to identify defects and ensure adherence to standards |
For each code change |
Development Team |
Static Code Analysis |
Automated scanning of code for quality and security issues |
Daily and for each build |
Quality Control Analyst |
Unit Testing |
Testing of individual components to verify correct operation |
For each code change |
Development Team |
Integration Testing |
Testing of integrated components to verify they work together correctly |
Weekly and for each release |
Quality Control Analyst |
Performance Testing |
Testing system performance under various load conditions |
Monthly and before major releases |
Infrastructure Team |
Security Testing |
Scanning and testing for security vulnerabilities |
Bi-weekly and before major releases |
Security Team |
Documentation Review |
Review of documentation for accuracy, completeness, and usability |
For each documentation update |
Documentation Team |
User Acceptance Testing |
Validation that the system meets user requirements |
Before each release |
Stakeholders |
Defect Management Process
- Identification: Defects are identified through testing, reviews, or user feedback
- Documentation: Defects are documented with severity, priority, and reproducible steps
- Assignment: Defects are assigned to appropriate team members for resolution
- Resolution: Team members implement fixes for assigned defects
- Verification: Quality Control verifies that defects have been properly resolved
- Closure: Verified defects are closed in the tracking system
Defect Severity Classification
Severity |
Description |
Resolution Timeframe |
Critical |
Prevents system operation or poses security risk |
Immediate (within 24 hours) |
High |
Significantly impacts functionality or performance |
Within 3 business days |
Medium |
Affects non-critical functionality or has workaround |
Within 7 business days |
Low |
Minor issue with minimal impact |
Before next major release |
- Code Analysis: PSScriptAnalyzer, Azure Resource Manager Template Toolkit
- Testing: Pester (PowerShell), Azure DevTest Labs
- Performance Testing: Azure Load Testing, Application Insights
- Security Testing: Microsoft Security Code Analysis, Azure Security Center
- Defect Tracking: Azure DevOps Work Items
Quality Assurance
Quality Assurance Activities
The following quality assurance activities will be performed to ensure that quality processes are properly implemented:
Activity |
Description |
Frequency |
Responsible |
Process Audits |
Review of quality processes to ensure they are being followed |
Quarterly |
Quality Assurance Specialist |
Work Product Audits |
Examination of work products to verify they meet quality standards |
Monthly |
Quality Assurance Specialist |
Quality Status Reviews |
Meetings to review quality metrics and improvement initiatives |
Bi-weekly |
Quality Manager |
Configuration Audits |
Verification that configuration items are correctly managed |
Monthly |
Quality Assurance Specialist |
Supplier Quality Assurance |
Assessment of third-party components for quality |
Before adoption and annually |
Quality Manager |
Quality Assurance Checklists
Standardized checklists will be used for key quality assurance activities:
- Code Review Checklist
- Documentation Review Checklist
- Security Review Checklist
- Release Readiness Checklist
- Infrastructure Configuration Checklist
Preventive Actions
The following preventive actions will be implemented to avoid quality issues:
- Training on quality standards and practices
- Development and distribution of templates and examples
- Implementation of automated quality checks in CI/CD pipelines
- Regular quality awareness communications
- Lessons learned sessions after each release
Quality Metrics
Key Quality Metrics
The following metrics will be tracked to measure quality performance:
Metric |
Description |
Target |
Measurement Method |
Defect Density |
Number of defects per 1,000 lines of code |
< 5 |
Static code analysis |
Test Coverage |
Percentage of code covered by automated tests |
> 80% |
Test coverage analysis |
Defect Escape Rate |
Percentage of defects found after release |
< 5% |
Defect tracking system |
First Time Pass Rate |
Percentage of work products that pass review on first attempt |
> 90% |
Quality review records |
Mean Time to Resolution |
Average time to resolve defects |
< 3 days |
Defect tracking system |
Technical Debt Ratio |
Ratio of remediation cost to development cost |
< 5% |
Static code analysis |
Documentation Accuracy |
Percentage of documentation items verified as accurate |
> 95% |
Documentation review |
Compliance Score |
Percentage of resources compliant with governance policies |
> 98% |
Governance dashboard |
User Satisfaction |
Average satisfaction score from user feedback |
> 4.5/5 |
User surveys |
Metric Collection and Reporting
- Metrics will be collected automatically where possible
- Manual metrics will be collected according to defined processes
- Quality metrics will be reported in a Quality Dashboard
- Metrics will be reviewed in bi-weekly Quality Status Reviews
- Trend analysis will be performed monthly
Quality Improvement Process
Continuous Improvement Approach
The ICT Governance Framework Application employs a continuous improvement approach based on the Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle:
- Plan: Identify improvement opportunities and plan changes
- Do: Implement changes on a small scale
- Check: Analyze results and determine effectiveness
- Act: Implement successful changes more broadly
Quality Improvement Identification
Quality improvement opportunities will be identified through:
- Analysis of quality metrics and trends
- Review of defect patterns
- Stakeholder feedback
- Process audits
- Industry best practice research
- Retrospective meetings
Quality Improvement Prioritization
Improvement initiatives will be prioritized based on:
- Impact on quality goals
- Resource requirements
- Implementation complexity
- Strategic alignment
- Return on investment
Quality Improvement Implementation
For each improvement initiative:
- Document the current process or standard
- Identify specific changes to be made
- Define success criteria and measurement approach
- Implement changes according to the plan
- Measure results against success criteria
- Adjust approach as needed based on results
- Document lessons learned
- Azure DevOps: Work item tracking, build pipelines, test management
- GitHub: Source control, code reviews, automated workflows
- Microsoft Power BI: Quality dashboards and reporting
- Azure Monitor: Performance and availability monitoring
- Microsoft Teams: Collaboration and communication
Quality Analysis Techniques
- Root Cause Analysis: Identify underlying causes of quality issues
- Pareto Analysis: Focus on the most significant quality problems
- Trend Analysis: Identify patterns and trends in quality metrics
- Statistical Process Control: Monitor process stability and capability
- Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA): Identify potential failure modes
Quality Control Techniques
- Peer Reviews: Collaborative examination of work products
- Static Analysis: Automated code scanning for quality issues
- Dynamic Testing: Testing of running system behavior
- Inspections: Formal examination of work products against standards
- Validation Testing: Verification that requirements are met
Quality Documentation
Quality Records
The following quality records will be maintained:
- Quality review results
- Test results and coverage reports
- Defect tracking records
- Audit findings and corrective actions
- Quality metrics and trends
- Process improvement initiatives
- Training records
- Meeting minutes from quality reviews
Document Control
All quality documentation will be:
- Stored in a centralized repository
- Version controlled
- Reviewed and approved by appropriate stakeholders
- Updated according to defined change control procedures
- Accessible to all team members
Reporting
Regular quality reports will include:
- Quality metrics dashboard
- Defect status summary
- Quality improvement initiative status
- Quality risks and mitigation strategies
- Upcoming quality activities
Appendices
Appendix A: Quality Checklists
Code Review Checklist
- Code follows defined coding standards
- Code is well-documented
- Error handling is implemented appropriately
- Security best practices are followed
- Unit tests are included and pass
- No code duplication or complexity issues
- Performance considerations are addressed
- Configuration values are properly parameterized
Documentation Review Checklist
- Documentation follows style guide
- All required sections are included
- Information is accurate and up-to-date
- No spelling or grammar errors
- Screenshots and diagrams are current and clear
- Links function correctly
- Format is consistent
- Target audience needs are addressed
Release Readiness Checklist
- All planned features are implemented
- All critical and high-priority defects are resolved
- Documentation is complete and up-to-date
- Performance testing shows acceptable results
- Security testing shows no critical vulnerabilities
- All required tests have passed
- Rollback plan is in place
- Support team is prepared for release
Appendix B: Quality Templates
Defect Report Template
- Defect ID
- Summary
- Severity
- Priority
- Environment
- Steps to reproduce
- Expected result
- Actual result
- Screenshots/logs
- Assigned to
- Status
- Resolution
Quality Audit Report Template
- Audit ID
- Audit date
- Auditor
- Scope
- Summary of findings
- Detailed observations
- Conformities
- Non-conformities
- Recommendations
- Action items
- Follow-up required
Quality Improvement Initiative Template
- Initiative ID
- Title
- Description
- Current state
- Desired state
- Success criteria
- Implementation plan
- Resources required
- Timeline
- Responsible parties
- Status
- Measurement approach
Appendix C: Quality Standards References
- ISO/IEC 9001:2015 Quality Management Systems
- ISO/IEC 25010:2011 Systems and Software Quality Requirements and Evaluation
- Microsoft Azure Well-Architected Framework
- NIST Special Publication 800-53 Security Controls
- PowerShell Scripting Best Practices
- Azure Resource Manager Best Practices
- Microsoft Style Guide